Introduction to the Case Study Collection

The Cyber Trust
Part of The Cyber Trust Family Internet Monitoring Project

NEW: FAMILY MONITORING PROJECT VIDEOS

The Cyber Trust has released three videos in a series covering different products that families can use to monitor activity. To access them visit that Trust's Youtube Channel here.

This collection of case studies explores real-world news stories highlighting how children and young people can be placed at risk through their online activities.

The collection is drawn from real cases investigated by the Cyber Choices team at the National Crime Agency and stories reported in the press.

All of these cases could have been prevented had parents been able to monitor their child's online activity and intervene.



News Item Link Cyber Choices Link

New plans to stop children taking, sharing or viewing nude images

Source:UK Government News

 


UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced plans to establish additional protections for children online at  the UK Tech Conference and Exhibition on Munday 8th June 2026. 

The plans would prevent children from taking, sharing or viewing naked images on their devices. New requirments would be placed on Apple and Google to activate their built-in features or implement technical solutions on smartphones and tablets to detect and block nude images for children.

The decision to take such action was, in part, a result of research undertaken by the Internet Watch Foundation. Their data indicated that 91% of online child sexual abuse reports recorded in 2024 contained self-generated content from children themselves and the average child now views pornography by age 13. 

Sexting can directly lead to sexploitation and evidence shows that this activity has reached very high levels of activity in recent years.

Read the full story here

 

 

Social media on trial: Four important cases to watch

Source: BBC news

 

 
This BBC report provides a useful insight into the four major court cases currently taking place within a landscape which include, companies like Meta, owner of Facebook and Instagram, Google, owner of Youtube, and Snapchat, along with relatively newer platforms like TikTok, Discord and social gaming platform Roblox, are facing thousands of lawsuits in the US over claims that they have instead harmed users, children in particular.

The cases include one in California which includes allegations from more than 1,000 school districts across the US. The schools accuse Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat and TikTok of being intentionally designed to be addictive, which has allegedly harmed children mentally and emotionally through their excessive use of platforms. 

A second case also in California, is focussed on Meta and Instagram. The complainants demand that Meta better prevent users under 13 years old from using its platforms and remove data it has previously collected from underage users, along with a host of other changes.

The third, against Roblox and Discord, was brought by a 13 year old boy who claims that he had been groomed and solicited by an individual who was arrested for his crimes which affected more that 24 children.  

Finally not about children, is a case brought by an Australian billionaire who sued Meta over the company's alleged failure to combat scam advertisements tricking Australians into fake investments that allegedly proliferated on Facebook using his name and likeness.

 For as long time these companies , and others have considered children to their future subscribers and have tried every trick to draw them in and keep them as apart of their user-base. The reason is that these new users become adults whose data has value.

There will be more of these cases in the coming years as governments try to find ways to keep children, and others, safe online.

To read the full article here

 


 

 

Children report record numbers of online sextortion attempts

Source: Care

 

Report Remove is a service run jointly by NSPCC and the Internet Watch Foundation has reported a 34% increase in reports of blackmail attempts on children in the past year.

The service encourages children and young people to report intimate images of themselves online and there has been a 34% rise in reports of blackmail attempts over the previous year.  

The service works by producing a ‘hash’ code that acts like a digital fingerprint, that can be shared shared with social media platforms to get the images taken down without directly sharing the images themselves. Of the 1,894 total reports by under-18s to the Report Remove service in 2025, 1,175 were so explicit as to qualify as child sexual abuse material.

Read the full story here

 


 

Social media as bad for children as smoking, British doctors say

Source: Brtish Medical Journal

 

British doctors have responded to the UK government consultation on the possible ban on Social Media for under 16 year olds by saying that  'Social media ranks alongside smoking as a danger to children'.

The report also refers to a statement made in the report that   "There can be few issues which have united clinicians so resoundingly ​in recent years as the impact that unfettered exposure to tech and devices is currently having ​on children and young people's health," 

More than half of 132 doctors surveyed saw at least one case of health harm that could ​be related to tech and devices every week, and over a third saw evidence of harm ​multiple times a week.\
 
The report will almost certainly have a significant impact on the outcome of the consultation and decisions about changes to UK law to deal with the issue are imminent.
 
Read the full story here
 

 

Nearly in one in five UK girls receive unwanted images online, poll finds

Source: The Guardian

 

Research undertaken by the charity Barnardos, found that almost one in five girls in the UK receive persistent, unwanted images online. In its survey of 4000 young people a quarter of girls had been called degrading names and one in seven had been asked to send nude images of themselves folowing contacts online.

Barnardo’s frontline practitioners reported that they were seeing more children affected by misogynistic content online, and an increase in child-on-child sexual abuse or children displaying problematic sexual behaviour, compared with last year. 

Read the full report here

 


 


TikTok and YouTube 'not safe enough' for kids, says Ofcom

Source: BBC News


 The UK telecom regulator OFCOM have stated that Tik Tok and Youtube are 'not safe enough for kids'. 

The statement sets out concerns of OFCOM researchers who suggest that, "TikTok and YouTube failed to commit to any significant changes to reduce harmful content being served to children, maintaining their feeds are already safe for children," it said.

"Our wealth of evidence, published today, suggests they are still not safe enough."

The companies both state that they have done a lot of work to protect children and their platforms are child safe. It also seems that the companies are still making changes, probably in response to such scrutiny. 

The reference to 'Shorts' on Youtube has been somewhat addressed as Youtube have changed a feature for managing shorts. You can now set the shorts setting to 0 mins whereas previously the minimum was 15 mins.  Whether this was done as a result of the report or not it shows that small changes can have a significant impact.

Read the full story here

 


 

NSPCC reports sharp rise in children being blackmailed over sexual images in UK

Source: The Guardian

 

 

This report regarding evidence collected by the NSPCC should be of greate concern to any parent. The reports suggests that there has been a  rise in online blackmail attempts involving sexual images in the UK last year(2025). The charity also reported thay contacts with its Childline service relating to online sexual abuse and exploitation rose by 36% last year, driven by an increase in cases related to online blackmail.

Sextorsion occurs when somone pursuades a child to release sexualised images of themselves and then blackmails the child by saying they will publish the images online and demanding payment from the child or its parents to remove them. The 36% rise is alarming and there are groeing demands from some to bring in social media bans for children under 16. The charity warns that such a ban might result in children who are not well prepared to protect themselves when they reach 16.

Read the full article here

 


 

WhatsApp launches totally private 'incognito' conversations with its AI chatbot

Source: BBC News


 One way of dealing with individuals and law enforcement asking for access to online communications as part of an investigation is to make access to that information impossible. This is what Meta have done regarding communications within Whatsapp. 

Incognito mode is set to off by default but when switched on all interactions with their AI chat bot vanish once the session is concluded and they cannot be reviewed or recovered. In incognito mode noone will be able to view or review the interactions.

Meta do offer a Parental Control option for Whatsapp so parents will need to switch that on in order help. monitor Whatsapp activity.

Configuring individual apps is time consuming but the monitoring tools we have reviewed do provide an efficient way to manage their child's screen time, app activity and location, some provide monitoring of communications. 

Read the fully story here

 


 

AI chatbots giving misleading voting advice in run-up to election

Source: BBC News

 

Concern regarding AI are being raised almost every day.  Misinformation generated from some AI chatbots range from the creation of sexual images of children for distribution online to providing misleading or even dangerous information which may cause children to do things they normally would not do or believe. We have seen such things in news items across the world.

This story illustrates one way errors in AI algorithms can threaten democracy. We know that the use of personal data had major impacts on the outcomes of Brexit in the UK and US presidential elections. AI can deal with huge amounts of data and tailor messages and information to shape thinking. This is potentially very dangerous.

As AI becomes ever more powerful and pursuasive the level of threat increases and we need to do everything we can to encourage children to question what they hear and what they read. 

Read the full story here

 


 

About 70% of babies exposed to screens, study finds

Source: BBC News

 

Many of us that are involved in the cyber world may not be surprised at this report published on the BBC website.

The report refers to research commissioned by a charity called 1001 Critical Days Foundation which was founded by a former UK cabinet member and MP and aims to support the early stages of a child's life in order to give them a good start.

The study, which took place between February and April 2026, found links between higher screen use and poorer developmental outcomes, such as sleep disruption, delayed language development and behavioural issues. This is an alarming find which backs up other research undertaken around the world.

A key message is that children under two years old should not ahev any screen time and if they do it should be part of an interaction with a parent. 

Read the full story here

 


 

Police Cyber team recently secured its first Stalking Prevention Order involving a juvenile

Source: Bedfordshire Police

 


 

Bedforshire Police have reported that they secured their first Stalking Prevention Order involving a teenage boy. 

The boy (unnamed) had created multiple social media accounts using the names of three girls from the same school. He then took images from the victims’ personal social media profiles and used AI technology to manipulate them into explicit images and published them online.
 
This sort of behaviour is a growing concern and in this case it isn't the sort of activity that Tech companies could easily monitor. In this case monitoring the boys device's might well have prevented him having to be subject to police investigation and sanction. Hopefully it is a lesson learnt.
 
Read the full posting here(Facebook Account not required) 
 
 

 

Schoolgirl, 12, ‘took her own life after Snapchat bullying’ as tributes pour in for ‘funny, kind-hearted girl’

Source: The Sun

 

 

A 12 year old schoolgirl, Amelia Bath.  was tragically found dead n her bedroom by her mum on March 6.  Police were called and they found messages on the girl's phone which indictaed that she was being bullied on the app Snapchat.

The parents reported that there had been no signs that Ameila was concerned or worried about anything and she was laughing and joking with her family the evening before.

The police investgation is still onging but this is a prime example of where parental scruting of communications between their children and other people need to be monitored or checked regularly in an attempt to prevent such tragic outcomes.

Read the full strory here.

 


 

 


Man who groomed 14-year-old girl he met on Roblox jailed for 28 months

Source: The Guardian

 

Carlo Tritta , an 18 year old when his predatory behaviour began, obsessively groomed a 14-year-old girl he met through the online gaming platform Roblox. He kept indecent images of the girl and travelled across the country from his home in Hampshire to visit her even though he had not been invited.

Such behaviour could have led to dreadful outcomes and he was sentenced to 18months in jail.

The girl's mother discovered what was heppening in August of 2025 but the grooming began in 2024 and became Tritta's obsession, causing great distress for the girl and her family.  On one occassion Tritta walked in through the back door of the girl's house in an attempt to ask her to drop the complaint, he also sent letters and attempted to contact her by phone.

The report does not state how the parent discovered the communicatios but clearly she was either monitoring her child's communications or found it following the girl sharing what was happening. 

Monitoring or checking a child's devices or devices is not snooping but an important parental responsibility to ensure children are kept safe. 

Read the full story here.

 


 

Online privacy should be treated like 'stranger danger' warnings, says UK regulator

Source: GB News

 

How much private information are children sharing online. There is growing concern about how much of this data sharing is taking place with ChatBots as well as people they know and strangers online.

This news article reports on some research undertaken by the Information Commissioners Office in the UK. 

The Information Commissioner's Office uncovered that 3 in 4 parents worry their child can't make safe choices online

  • Survey reveals parents' concern over children handing over private information
  • Online privacy includes children’s names, real ages, and where they live
  • Nearly 22% of children have been found handing over this information
  • The UK Government has launched a review to ban social media for under-16s
  • The Government is also running a social media ban simulation at the moment
  • Australia recently became the first country to implement similar social media rules

The ICOI uses parents to treat children's online privacy as "as natural as teaching a child to cross the road" or stranger danger campaigns. The concerns relate to sharing a wide range of information such as  Their names, ages, where they live, and less obvious information such as but also less obvious information like their browsing history, purchases, photos, voice notes and social media or gaming activity." 

Read the full story here


One click too many? 75% of parents fear their kids aren't making safe choices online

:Source: Information Commissioners

 

The UK's Information Commissioners office have launched a campaign they call 'Switched on to privacy campaign' aimed at  helping parents of kids aged four to 11 start simple conversations about protecting their personal information online.  

Backed by stakeholders, the campaign urges parents to treat online privacy as an essential life skill - as natural as teaching a child to cross the road.  

The project follows a period of research and reflection which concluded that 
 

  •  24% have shared their real name or address online, with eight and nine-year-olds most at risk.   
  • 22% have shared personal information such as health details with AI tools
  • 35% of parents believe their child would share personal information in exchange for game tokens or rewards. 
     

Getting children to keep their identity secure, not share passwords or devices with friends and to use passwords that are difficult to guess (pets names etc) can be difficult. They trust those that they regard as friends almost without question and childhood friendships can often be short lived.

Read the full report here


 


Children in UK report online sextortion attempts in record numbers

Source: The Guardian


 

Children are reporting online sextortion attempts in record numbers in the UK, as campaigners urge tech companies to do more to stamp out the crime.

The Report Remove service, which allows children to flag intimate images or videos of themselves that have appeared, or could appear, online, said it received 394 reports from under-18s last year of blackmail attempts after sending sexual images to predators. The figure is 34% higher than in 2024.

The report goes on to describe the nature of sextorsion and  how increasing numbers of children are being targetted. The report also states that 98% of targetted young people are boys which might surprise some parents as girls are felt to be more vulerable to some form of online abuse.

Read the full story here.

 



Screen time for under-fives should be limited to one hour a day, parents told

Source: BBC News

 

Children under the age of five should be limited to one hour of screen time a day, while under-twos should not be watching screens alone, new government guidance says.

This is the  headline on the BBC Family news section published on 26th March 2026.

It advises parents to steer clear of fast-paced videos and use screens together where possible. The guidance also suggests "screen swaps" - taking screens away to read stories together or playing simple games at mealtimes.

We all know how 'useful' it may be to have a screen handy to occupy a young child when we have other things to do but there are clearly downsides to unlimited screen time. The use of digital entertainment is a wholly passive process. Kids colouring, drawing, making things playing games with each other and many other activities that create the rounded personality are missing if the diet is limited to screen time of gaming.

Parents need to create a digital plan for their families. We know that young children live in a hi-tech world and they need to become familiar with it. This doesnt mean total uncontolled access to devices. There are screen time controls for all devices which remove the need to direct intervetion but create a timetable of access which children soon become familier with. Make the restrictions the norm and it will become part of their daily activities.

Read the ful story here


Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds

Source: The Guardian

 

 

A significant outcome of the US trial of Meta brought by an unnamed plaintiff using the nom de plume of KGM. KGM's claim was that she had became addicted to YouTube at age six and Instagram at nine, which she said had deleterious effects on her wellbeing. By age 10, she said, she had become depressed and was engaging in self-harm as a result. Her social media use allegedly caused her to have strained relationships with her family and in school. When she was 13, KGM’s therapist diagnosed her with body dysmorphic disorder and social phobia, which KGM attributes to her use of Instagram and YouTube.

Meta and YouTube have been found liable for deliberately designing addictive products that hooked the young user and led to her being harmed, a jury ruled on Wednesday. Jurors found the tech companies to be both negligent and having failed to provide adequate warnings about the potential dangers of their products.

The jury awarded the plaintiff in the case compensatory damages of $3m, with Meta to pay 70% and YouTube the remainder. Deliberations over punitive damages, also awarded, will begin later on Wednesday.

 Read the full story here

Six families sue TikTok after their kids die trying viral ‘choking challenge’

Source: The Independant

  

 
 
This story is incredibly sad. Young people given a challenge that to some might sound the sort of thing any kid might try. 'Choke yourself for as long as you can'. Six families have lost their children in this way as they blacked out and never recovered.
 
Six families have sued TikTok who hosted the 'Blackout Challenge on their platform. One family from the USA and five others from the UK are leading the legal action. The mother of one UK teenager has led a campaign to force social media platforms to release data of a child's social media activity in the event of a child’s death but the access to that data has been denied by the companies citing privacy laws that prevent them releasing the information. They also have stated that the data is deleted after a short period and is no longer available to clarify just what the children we actually watching. 
 
Ellen Roome has led the campaign in the UK for 'Joules Law' , named after he son, which would require social media companies to retain data for set period which can be accessed by parents and law enforcement.
 
This is one more reason why monitoring what your child is accessing with their agreement is so important. Adults can make judgements about such challenges which might elude young people and by building a digital trust relationship through monitoring could have saved some of these families from such awful consequences.

 
Read the full story here 
 
 

Midlands parents asked 'are your kids safe' as police warn of new risk online

Source: Birmingham Live

 

 

Birmingham Live News reports that Police have issued a warning to parents over the online dangers facing their children every day, from cyber bullying to sexual exploitation.

And here in 2026, AI is only worsening the issues by introducing "content based on their searches," West Mercia Police said.

We are aware of the power of AI and that it can be used in very productive ways by professionals and children but it also has the power to carry out searches that would take hours if you were to undertake them on your own. As its learning algorithms improve this will become and even more  powerful tool.

The police report  advises that parents need to ensure that Safety settings are in place, including parental controls on all devices, browsers, and Apps to "filter out inappropriate material," the force advised.  It also advises that "Set strong privacy settings to make sure personal information is only visible to trusted individuals i.e. “Friends only”. The police also recommends introducing your child to smartphones and other devices gradually in a monitored way before giving them fuller access.

Our Cybertrust Internet Monitoring Project aims to support parents to put such controls in place and to make best use of them within the family.  

  



 

Children being 'failed by tech companies' amid rise in online sex abuse images

Source: ITVX

 


Efforts to protect children from some of the worst aspects of online abuse and dangerous online content has made some progress through legislation passed by the UK government last year.  

Even so, reports continue to appear about the continued rise on child sex abuse image crimes logged by police forces in the UK. Such reports have risen by nearly 10% in the past year, the children's charity NSPCC has said.

The NSPCC said that of the 10,811 crimes where police forces recorded which social media platforms perpetrators used in relation to child sex abuse image crimes, 43%, or a total of 4,615, took place on Snapchat.

Meanwhile, Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp accounted for almost a quarter of all offences (24%), the charity said. 

In other reports is is clear that the restrictions on access to video pornography, through such approaches as age verification  are still not totally effective. Many of the lesser known porography sites have not implimented age verification and these are not being blocked by  service providers.

Read the full story here.  

 


Regulator contacts Meta over workers watching intimate AI glasses videos

Source: BBC News

 

Digital glasses have been around for some time. Early attempts tried to make them almost a replacement for watching media direct to your eye rather than on your mobile phone or other devices. Early AI developments produced ideas of using such glasses to wear when in an unfamiliar city with maps and directions coming up as you moved around. Advances in AI are producing much more complex functions.

This story is a result of concerns by the UK data watchdog which has approached  Meta following a "concerning" report claiming outsourced workers were able to view sensitive content filmed by the company's AI smart glasses.

Meta said subcontracted workers might sometimes review content, including films and images, captured by its AI smart glasses for the purpose of improving the "experience".

Videos, including of glasses-wearers using the toilet or having sex, are sometimes reviewed by a Kenya-based Meta subcontractor, according to an investigation by Swedish newspapers, external Svenska Dagbladet (SvD) and Goteborgs-Posten (GP).

You might ask why would this be of any interest to anyone but if you wear such devices at work or reading documents then all of that data can be reviewed by META or those it may sell such data to. At a minimum privacy issues arise but capture commercially sensitive information or even national security information could lead to very dangerous outcomes.

 Read the full story here

Father claims Google's AI product fuelled son's delusional spiral

Source: BBC News

This new story from the BBC begins with the following warning:

 Warning - this story contains distressing content and discussion of suicide

 The story concerns the suicide of a 36 year old man which the father claims was due to excessing use of Google's AI tool.

The father of a Florida man is suing Google in the first wrongful death case in the US against the tech giant over alleged harms caused by its artificial intelligence (AI) tool Gemini.

The father said that Google's flagship AI product had fuelled a delusional spiral that prompted his 36-year old son, Jonathan, to kill himself last year.

The claim alleges that Google made design choices that ensured Gemini would "never break character" so that the firm could "maximise engagement through emotional dependency."

Other examples of potential dangers of the development of AI tools have been appearing in many articles in recent months and The Cyber Trust would urge parents to take note of their child's use of AI. AI code will pervade the world of gaming, online dialogue and fake news stories and many other aspects of life over the coming years.

Read the full story here

 

Instagram boosts privacy and parental control on teen accounts

Source: BBC News

 

 

In Spetmber of 2024  Instagram changed the way the site worked for teenagers by introducing their new “teen accounts”. These new accounts, which function to the age of 18, were initially made available to users in the UK, US , Canada and Austrailia. Children aged 13 to 15 will only be able to adjust the settings by adding a parent or guardian to their account.  See the original story here.

Research undertaken on the effectiveness of the changes towards the end of 2025 indictaed that up to 64% of safety tools are ineffective or missing.

Key Findings on Performance:
  • Mixed Effectiveness: Independent testing by child safety groups found that 30 out of 47 safety tools were "substantially ineffective or no longer exist".
  • Content and Contact Risks: Researchers reported that accounts still accessed harmful content, including suicide/self-harm, and were exposed to sexualized comments from adults.
  • Algorithmic Issues: Studies suggest algorithms still recommend inappropriate content or accounts, contradicting safety promises.
  • Parental Control Usage: While parental supervision features exist, reports indicate they are underutilized, with some parents unaware of how to leverage them  

In February 2026 Instagram announced parents using Instagram's child supervision tools would soon receive alerts if their teen repeatedly searches for suicide or self-harm related terms on the platform. Whilst this sounds a good step forward it is questionable whther it will prove effective and leaves a lot of potential dangers to still get through. Time will tell.

A more concerning  issue for parents must be that if they have to impliment this for Instagram, they will then have to set up similar protections for each product as they become available which is a daunting prospect if you add gaming into the app soup of mobile device apps.

More worrying still, is the view expressed by the UK regulator OFCOM, that a major problem is the actual' willingness of parents to intervene to keep their children safe online.  Sir Nick Clegg, speaking for META said: “One of the things we do find… is that even when we build these controls, parents don’t use them.”

Read the latest new story on this issue here

Two options - Help parents to impliment these controls through evidence of their effectiveness and support. Alternatively put all of their trust in governments regulating the tech industried alone. Whilst the latter will have a significant impact it ignores the key dynamic of promoting the parent child relationship to ensure that childrens online activities are monitored effectively. 

This whole argument is what inderpins the current project of  The CyberTrust's Internet Family Monitoring Project which can be found here.


 

Why fake AI videos of UK urban decline are taking over social media

Source: BBC News

 



This news story is the latest example of how AI can be used to undermine democracy. If you can convince the casual news reader that things are really really bad in your country or location you can inject dissatisfaction into that community.  This is an insidious attempt to manipulate people and build up a negative view of things around them. When you are feeling that way you are easy prey to manipulation and that is the angenda here.

The BBC story refers to an AI-generated video shows a crowd of young - mostly black - men, wearing balaclavas and padded jackets, slipping down a water slide into a dirty swimming pool with litter bobbing on the surface. The caption describes the scene as a taxpayer-funded water park in Croydon. This implies that the area is in steep decline and is totally fake.

Our young people need to be able to test such stories by checking other news sources to see if the information can be confirmed as being true. Checking takes time and effort and this is what the publishers of such material bank on knowing that it might trigger rumours that will spread.

As adults we need to engage with what children are reading online and challenge the narrative that is being promoted.  This is one of the important strands of our Family Monitoring Project.

Read the full story here


 

UK Social Media Ban for Under-16s: Implications and Implementation Challenges

Source: Bloomsbery Intelligence and Security Institute


 

The House of Lords voted 261 to 150 on 21 January 2026 to amend the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, requiring platforms to implement effective age assurance measures blocking under-16s within 12 months. This part of the process by UKG to make the decision whether new legislation will be brought into law later this year.

The report takes a deep look at the various aspects of the issue which many will already be aware of. This follows on from Austrilias decision to ban social media to under sixteen yoru olds and looks at the technical issues and challanged that such bans uncover.

An aspect that most arguements do not cover are the potemtial down sides of such legislation.

One section headed 'Digital Preparedness and the Voting Age Paradox' makes very interesting reading. The introductory paragraph reads;

"A blanket ban risks leaving young people unprepared for digital environments they will inevitably encounter. Bans will likely deprive teenagers of opportunities to develop digital literacy skills by navigating online environments gradually and with guidance. Shielding children entirely from social media can delay essential conversations about online risks while hampering their ability to build competencies early."

Such considerations are a vital part of the debate. the last thing we want is to have a large number of teenagers who lack the experience of the online world. They need to develop the skills of communicating online with other friends whilst they are likely to be more receptive to advice and guidanced of adult role models.

Read the full report here.






Police arresting 1,000 paedophile suspects a month across UK

Source: The Guardian

 

The National Crime Agency (NCA) reports that a significant rise in child sexual abuse being driven by technology and online forums. Whilst the UK laws on protecting children from accessing unsuitable material and grooming by peadofiles the report suggests that things are getting worse.

One of the major issues is that most of the changes are placed on tech companies to establish the necessary guardrails this does not mean that everything will be interecepted by their monitoring solutions.   

The NCA said the growth in offending across the UK was driven by technology and linked to the radicalisation of offenders in online forums, encouraging people to view images of child sexual abuse by reassuring them it was normal.

Most contact with children happened on mainstream social media platforms, with algorithms pushing paedophilic material to people who have shown a previous interest in it.

This one further reason that parental monitoring can add a signifcant layer of support for youg people.  

Read the full story  here.