New guidance for parents and carers as AI-manipulated images of children become a growing concern Source: National Crime Agency

 

UK's National Crime Agency issued guidance for parents and carers to alert them to the growing threat of children's images shared online being manipulated into AI generated sexual abuse material. 

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) and the National Crime Agency (NCA) have seen an increase in online offenders exploiting openly available images of children to create realistic sexualised content.

IWF analysts found 3,440 AI-generated videos of child sexual abuse in 2025, compared to just 13 in 2024, and the NCA have increasingly seen offenders exploiting AI technologies to target children in new ways.

 The use of AI to manipulate images posted online and turn these against the targets is not something that is easy to block or taken down, particularly when direct communications are used to make contact.

Chief Executive of the Internet watch Foundation stated that "The threat is disturbing. If someone's imagery is online, they could be easy pickings for criminals and anyone, especially children, could find themselves being targeted."

Read the guidance here. 

Porn site company fined £630,000 over failed age checks Source: BBC News

 

The UK regulator continues its challenges to Porn sites that remain open without any age verification in place. The rules regarding such material are governed by UK legislation design to prevent children and young people from accessing such content by requiring the service providers to implement effective age verification mechanisms.

 

 Failure to do this results in fines and other actions against the provider and to date a large number of such providers have obeyed the law and put controls in place. 

 

This latest story from July 2026 shows that such fines can be massive and grow should companies refuse to obey the UK legislation. If companies refuse to comply OFCOM have a range of actions they can take:

• Substantial Fines: Ofcom has the authority to fine non-compliant companies up to £18 million or 10% of their global annual turnover, whichever is higher. For example, the regulator has previously fined adult providers up to £1.35 million for failing to enforce proper age verification.  
• Daily Financial Penalties: Sites that fail to comply after being penalized or those that ignore legally binding information requests face ongoing daily financial penalties. 
• Site Blocking: In extreme cases of persistent non-cooperation or refusal to implement checks, Ofcom holds the power to block access to the website entirely within the UK.

The rules seem to be working with fines amounting to over £2.5million issued since the beginning of 2026.

 

Read the full story here. 

 

 

Outcry as Meta lets users make AI images from public Instagram profile pics Source: BBC News

 

 

BBC News report describes complaints aimed at Meta over its new AI tool Muse Image. There are a number of tools that can create images from simple sentences but Muse can generate pictures using other people's profile pictures without telling them.

While Meta says users can opt out of their image being used even with a public account, Donald Campbell, advocacy director at tech justice non-profit Foxglove told the BBC it was an "obvious recipe for disaster".

"We've already seen a catalogue of harms from non-consensual AI-altered images on social platforms just in the past year," he added.

Read the full story here. 

School smartphone bans seen as ‘punitive’ by young people, study says Source: The Guardian

 This report from The Guardian reports on a study undertaken by University College London. The report suggests that outright smartphone bans may have unintended negative consequences for young people.

The study questioned 732 secondary school students aged 11 to 18, as well as 27 teachers and 41 parents about their views on phone bans, using questionnaires, interviews and focus groups.

There was widespread agreement about the potentially disruptive influence of smartphones in the classroom, but the research uncovered a sharp generational divide. While 87% of teachers and 88% of parents were in favour of a blanket ban, 75% of pupils disagreed with the policy.

Students argued that banning smartphones restricted access to “essential” tools they relied on to navigate daily life and support their learning, such as bus timetables, weather forecasts and homework apps. They also valued the fact that smartphones offered direct access to helpful support networks, and girls in particular said their smartphones helped them feel safer when travelling alone.

Such arguments are to be expected from the young people that are the target of the school day ban. In fact the various ways schools are implementing the ban do allow students access at the end of the school day and most use one of the following strategies to manage the ban.

Lockable Pouches: Students place phones in specialised, sealed magnetic pouches. The pouches remain locked all day and are opened magnetically by staff at dismissal. 

Designated Lockers & Charging Stations: Students secure devices in assigned lockers upon arrival, often with charging ports available.

"Brick Phone" Mandates: Some institutions mandate that students swap smartphones for basic, non-internet-capable "brick phones" for safety while commuting. 

Hand-In Policies: Pupils hand their phones into lock-boxes or designated bins at the start of every school day or class period. 

Discretionary Exceptions: Schools adjust protocols to allow phones for students who need them for medical conditions, special needs, or specific safeguarding.  

Only time will tell how well these new rules work and how it impacts on young people, their school work and their safety. Pushing all traffic until after the school day is over does not remove the issue from their lives.

Read the full story here. 

Social Media Was Banned in Australia for Kids Under 16. Months Later, More Than 85% of Them Are Still Online Source: People.com

 

The UK's recent actions to manage social media access for children under 16 followed the similar actions taken by the Australian government. This report would suggest that legislation is not an easy option in controlling access to social media as it would appear.

The report suggests that after three months of the start of the ban a significant proportion of the target age group are still online engaging in social media activities. The report isn't anti legislation but it states that it could take a decade for the intention of the law take full effect.

The article also includes a statement from the UK's NSPCC  (National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children) which states that “It's evident from this research that a ban alone will not keep all children safe from harm online,”

Parents must play a part in the protection of their children and monitoring such activity on a child;s device is still an effective way to add a further layer of protection which is closer to home.

Read the full article here.